Lista de obras -

A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE.

artículo científico publicado en 2018

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction

artículo científico publicado en 2017

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction

artículo científico publicado en 2016

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines

artículo científico publicado en 2016

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines

artículo científico publicado en 2017

GRADE Guidelines 30: The GRADE Approach to Assessing the Certainty of Modelled Evidence - an Overview in the Context of Health Decision-making

artículo científico publicado en 2020

GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health

artículo científico publicado en 2016

GRADE Guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.

artículo científico publicado en 2018

GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

scientific article published on 09 November 2019

GRADE guidelines 27: how to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in summary of findings tables and Evidence Profiles

scientific article published on 09 November 2019

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

scientific article published on 12 February 2020

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

artículo científico publicado en 2020

GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations.

artículo científico publicado en 2019

GRADE guidelines: 29. Rating the certainty in time-to-event outcomes - Study limitations due to censoring of participants with missing data in intervention studies

scientific article published on 29 September 2020

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency

artículo científico

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness

artículo científico publicado en 2011

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

artículo científico

Lista de obras de

A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE.

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines

GRADE Guidelines 30: The GRADE Approach to Assessing the Certainty of Modelled Evidence - an Overview in the Context of Health Decision-making

GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health

GRADE Guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.

GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

GRADE guidelines 27: how to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in summary of findings tables and Evidence Profiles

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations.

GRADE guidelines: 29. Rating the certainty in time-to-event outcomes - Study limitations due to censoring of participants with missing data in intervention studies

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence