Lista de obras -

'Trial Exegesis': Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review

artículo científico publicado en 2016

'We all want to succeed, but we've also got to be realistic about what is happening': an ethnographic study of relationships in trial oversight and their impact

artículo científico publicado en 2017

A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Unplanned General Surgery

artículo científico publicado en 2015

A mixed-methods feasibility and external pilot study to inform a large pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effects of surgical wound dressing strategies on surgical site infections (Bluebelle Phase B): study protocol for a randomised contro

artículo científico publicado en 2017

A systematic review of on-site monitoring methods for health-care randomised controlled trials

artículo científico

An ethnographic study of group decision making to understand and improve how trial steering committees contribute to trial conduct

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Artificial intelligence as a diagnostic aid in cross-sectional radiological imaging of surgical pathology in the abdominopelvic cavity: a systematic review

artículo científico publicado en 2023

Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study. ⬇️

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Core outcomes for randomized trials and core information for clinical decision-making: implications for outcome selection.

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

artículo científico publicado en 2014

Development of a 'universal-reporter' outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design

scientific article published on 24 August 2019

Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study

artículo científico publicado en 2019

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient report or observer completion

artículo científico publicado en 2017

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient self-report and observer completion: a novel method of questionnaire design.

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)

artículo científico publicado en 2019

Do the risk factors of age, family history of prostate cancer or a higher prostate specific antigen level raise anxiety at prostate biopsy?

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Evaluation of source data verification in a multicentre cancer trial (PROTECT).

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Incorporating patient reported outcomes (PROs) in gastro-intestinal (GI) cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the need for adequate rationale and integrated reporting.

artículo científico publicado en 2011

Methods for selecting health concepts and domains from in-depth qualitative interviews for the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS): a case study.

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set

scientific article published on 04 October 2020

ProDiet: A Phase II Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Green Tea Catechins and Lycopene in Men at Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer

artículo científico publicado en 2018

Psychological impact of prostate biopsy: physical symptoms, anxiety, and depression

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery

artículo científico publicado en 2014

Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer

artículo científico publicado en 2012

The case for a HRQL core outcome set: outcome reporting bias in oesophageal cancer studies

artículo científico publicado en 2011

The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection.

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development.

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT

scientific article published on 01 August 2019

Trial outcomes and information for clinical decision-making: a comparative study of opinions of health professionals ⬇️

artículo científico publicado en 2016

What are the roles and valued attributes of a Trial Steering Committee? Ethnographic study of eight clinical trials facing challenges

artículo científico publicado en 2016

What is the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) item order on prioritisation of PROs in the development of a core outcome set?

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Lista de obras de

'Trial Exegesis': Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review

'We all want to succeed, but we've also got to be realistic about what is happening': an ethnographic study of relationships in trial oversight and their impact

A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Unplanned General Surgery

A mixed-methods feasibility and external pilot study to inform a large pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effects of surgical wound dressing strategies on surgical site infections (Bluebelle Phase B): study protocol for a randomised contro

A systematic review of on-site monitoring methods for health-care randomised controlled trials

An ethnographic study of group decision making to understand and improve how trial steering committees contribute to trial conduct

Artificial intelligence as a diagnostic aid in cross-sectional radiological imaging of surgical pathology in the abdominopelvic cavity: a systematic review

Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study. ⬇️

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes

Core outcomes for randomized trials and core information for clinical decision-making: implications for outcome selection.

Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Development of a 'universal-reporter' outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design

Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient report or observer completion

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient self-report and observer completion: a novel method of questionnaire design.

Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)

Do the risk factors of age, family history of prostate cancer or a higher prostate specific antigen level raise anxiety at prostate biopsy?

Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.

Evaluation of source data verification in a multicentre cancer trial (PROTECT).

Incorporating patient reported outcomes (PROs) in gastro-intestinal (GI) cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the need for adequate rationale and integrated reporting.

Methods for selecting health concepts and domains from in-depth qualitative interviews for the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS): a case study.

Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set

ProDiet: A Phase II Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Green Tea Catechins and Lycopene in Men at Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer

Psychological impact of prostate biopsy: physical symptoms, anxiety, and depression

Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery

Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer

The case for a HRQL core outcome set: outcome reporting bias in oesophageal cancer studies

The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection.

Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development.

Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development

Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT

Trial outcomes and information for clinical decision-making: a comparative study of opinions of health professionals ⬇️

What are the roles and valued attributes of a Trial Steering Committee? Ethnographic study of eight clinical trials facing challenges

What is the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) item order on prioritisation of PROs in the development of a core outcome set?