Lista de obras -

A 45-year-old woman referred for an independent medical evaluation by her insurer

artículo científico publicado en 2014

A Case for Clarity, Consistency, and Helpfulness: State-of-the-Art Clinical Practice Guidelines in Endocrinology Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System

article

A systematic review finds that methodological quality is better than its reputation but can be improved in physiotherapy trials in childhood cerebral palsy.

artículo científico publicado en 2006

An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?

artículo científico publicado en 2006

An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?

scientific article published on 01 January 2006

Atraumatic versus conventional lumbar puncture needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

artículo científico publicado en 2017

Attitudes towards evaluation of psychiatric disability claims: a survey of Swiss stakeholders

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Comparing the USPSTF and GRADE approaches to recommendations

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Deciding what type of evidence and outcomes to include in guidelines: article 5 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report

artículo científico publicado en 2012

Determinants of knowledge gain in evidence-based medicine short courses: an international assessment

artículo científico publicado en 2010

Ethics and legalities associated with independent medical evaluations

artículo científico publicado en 2014

Evaluation of work capacity in Switzerland: a survey among psychiatrists about practice and problems

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Evaluation of work disability and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: what to expect and what not

artículo científico publicado en 2012

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer: the need for a unified approach

artículo científico publicado en 2007

Expectation of sickness absence duration: a review on statements and methods used in guidelines in Europe and North America

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Functional Interviewing Was Associated With Improved Agreement Among Expert Psychiatrists in Estimating Claimant Work Capacity: A Secondary Data Analysis of Real-Life Work Disability Evaluations

artículo científico publicado en 2020

GRADE Guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.

artículo científico publicado en 2018

GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

article

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

artículo científico publicado en 2011

GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

artículo científico

GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes

artículo científico publicado en 2012

GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes

artículo científico

GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations

artículo científico publicado en 2013

GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.

artículo científico publicado en 2010

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

scientific article published on 12 February 2020

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

artículo científico publicado en 2020

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias

artículo científico

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency

artículo científico

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness

artículo científico publicado en 2011

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

artículo científico

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Going from evidence to recommendations

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Guideline group composition and group processes: article 3 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report

artículo científico

How strong is the evidence?

artículo científico publicado en 2008

How to teach evidence-based medicine to teachers: reflections from a workshop experience.

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Integrating an evidence-based medicine rotation into an internal medicine residency program.

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies.

artículo científico publicado en 2017

Misconceptions, challenges, uncertainty, and progress in guideline recommendations

scientific article published on 01 July 2008

Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

artículo científico publicado en 2018

Opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Perceived disagreement (mostly) not confirmed by evidence... A reply to Watine et al.: Clinical practice guidelines: myths and misconceptions

artículo científico publicado en 2014

Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire

scientific article published on 17 September 2020

Point: evidence-based medicine has a sound scientific base

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany: give the child a name

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

artículo científico publicado en 2011

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

artículo científico publicado en 2007

Reporting about disability evaluation in European countries.

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Reporting of IMMPACT-recommended core outcome domains among trials assessing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Return to work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

artículo científico publicado en 2012

Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave.

artículo científico publicado en 2017

Sickness certification in primary care: a survey on views and practices among Swiss physicians

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Stakeholder involvement: how to do it right: article 9 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report

artículo científico

Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis

artículo científico publicado en 2010

Stopping randomized trials early for benefit: a protocol of the Study Of Trial Policy Of Interim Truncation-2 (STOPIT-2)

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Testing the HTA core model: experiences from two pilot projects

artículo científico publicado en 2009

The HTA core model: a novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments.

artículo científico publicado en 2009

The need for expertise and the scientific base of evidence-based medicine

artículo científico publicado en 2009

The pylorus: take it or leave it? Systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus standard whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary cancer

artículo científico publicado en 2007

The reproducibility of psychiatric evaluations of work disability: two reliability and agreement studies

scientific article published on 03 July 2019

Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Use of a structured functional evaluation process for independent medical evaluations of claimants presenting with disabling mental illness: rationale and design for a multi-center reliability study

artículo científico publicado en 2016

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Which patients to include in the analysis?

scientific article published on 01 June 2006

[Last but not least--the German Network EbM has got its glossary on EbM terms]

artículo científico publicado en 2004

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany - a comment - letter no. 2]

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Lista de obras de

A 45-year-old woman referred for an independent medical evaluation by her insurer

A Case for Clarity, Consistency, and Helpfulness: State-of-the-Art Clinical Practice Guidelines in Endocrinology Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System

A systematic review finds that methodological quality is better than its reputation but can be improved in physiotherapy trials in childhood cerebral palsy.

An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?

An emerging consensus on grading recommendations?

Atraumatic versus conventional lumbar puncture needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Attitudes towards evaluation of psychiatric disability claims: a survey of Swiss stakeholders

Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity

Comparing the USPSTF and GRADE approaches to recommendations

Deciding what type of evidence and outcomes to include in guidelines: article 5 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report

Determinants of knowledge gain in evidence-based medicine short courses: an international assessment

Ethics and legalities associated with independent medical evaluations

Evaluation of work capacity in Switzerland: a survey among psychiatrists about practice and problems

Evaluation of work disability and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: what to expect and what not

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer: the need for a unified approach

Expectation of sickness absence duration: a review on statements and methods used in guidelines in Europe and North America

Functional Interviewing Was Associated With Improved Agreement Among Expert Psychiatrists in Estimating Claimant Work Capacity: A Secondary Data Analysis of Real-Life Work Disability Evaluations

GRADE Guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.

GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes

GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes

GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations

GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Going from evidence to recommendations

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies

Guideline group composition and group processes: article 3 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report

How strong is the evidence?

How to teach evidence-based medicine to teachers: reflections from a workshop experience.

Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

Integrating an evidence-based medicine rotation into an internal medicine residency program.

Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies.

Misconceptions, challenges, uncertainty, and progress in guideline recommendations

Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

Opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Perceived disagreement (mostly) not confirmed by evidence... A reply to Watine et al.: Clinical practice guidelines: myths and misconceptions

Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire

Point: evidence-based medicine has a sound scientific base

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany: give the child a name

Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

Reporting about disability evaluation in European countries.

Reporting of IMMPACT-recommended core outcome domains among trials assessing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain

Return to work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave

Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave.

Sickness certification in primary care: a survey on views and practices among Swiss physicians

Stakeholder involvement: how to do it right: article 9 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report

Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis

Stopping randomized trials early for benefit: a protocol of the Study Of Trial Policy Of Interim Truncation-2 (STOPIT-2)

Testing the HTA core model: experiences from two pilot projects

The HTA core model: a novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments.

The need for expertise and the scientific base of evidence-based medicine

The pylorus: take it or leave it? Systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus standard whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary cancer

The reproducibility of psychiatric evaluations of work disability: two reliability and agreement studies

Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive

Use of a structured functional evaluation process for independent medical evaluations of claimants presenting with disabling mental illness: rationale and design for a multi-center reliability study

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?

Which patients to include in the analysis?

[Last but not least--the German Network EbM has got its glossary on EbM terms]

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany - a comment - letter no. 2]