Lista de obras -

A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making When Selecting Outcome Measurement Instruments for Summary of Findings Tables in Systematic Reviews: Results from an OMERACT Working Group

artículo científico

A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set.

artículo científico publicado en 2014

A qualitative study investigating the meaning of participation to improve the measurement of this construct

scientific article published on 16 April 2019

By using a core outcome set we measure what matters to patients

artículo científico publicado en 2018

COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.

artículo científico publicado en 2018

Comment on "Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered".

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Consensus on the Need for a Hierarchical List of Patient-reported Pain Outcomes for Metaanalyses of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: An OMERACT Objective

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Consensus on the need for a hierarchical list of patient-reported pain outcomes for meta-analyses of knee osteoarthritis trials

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain

artículo científico publicado en 2018

Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Current challenges in clinimetrics

artículo científico publicado en 2003

Definition of clinical differences

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Dialogue on Developing Consensus on Measurement and Presentation of Patient-important Outcomes, Using Pain Outcomes as an Exemplar, in Systematic Reviews: A Preconference Meeting at OMERACT 12.

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Effectiveness of exercise therapy: a best-evidence summary of systematic reviews

artículo científico publicado en 2005

Erratum to: Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Everyday Barriers in Communicative Participation According to People With Communication Problems

scientific article published in 2023

How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT)

artículo científico publicado en 2019

Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach.

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Yearly Imaging Surveillance in Patients Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

artículo científico publicado en 2022

Predicting sequelae and death after bacterial meningitis in childhood: A systematic review of prognostic studies ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 5 de agosto de 2010

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

artículo científico publicado en 2011

Reproducibility and validity of the DynaPort KneeTest

artículo científico publicado en 2005

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 28 de enero de 2011

Substitution of Usual Perioperative Care by eHealth to Enhance Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing General Surgical or Gynecological Procedures: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Systematic Review of Childhood Sedentary Behavior Questionnaires: What do We Know and What is Next?

artículo científico publicado en 2016

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

artículo científico publicado en 2017

The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument

artículo científico publicado en 2016

The Value of Item Banks, CAT, and PROMIS for Dermatology

artículo científico publicado en 2020

Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values.

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for Automatic Assessment of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function Based on Area Strain ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 1 de marzo de 2011

Validation of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks in Dutch adolescents.

artículo científico publicado en 2018

Validation of two PROMIS item banks for measuring social participation in the Dutch general population

artículo científico publicado en 2018

When to use agreement versus reliability measures.

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Lista de obras de

A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making When Selecting Outcome Measurement Instruments for Summary of Findings Tables in Systematic Reviews: Results from an OMERACT Working Group

A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set.

A qualitative study investigating the meaning of participation to improve the measurement of this construct

By using a core outcome set we measure what matters to patients

COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.

Comment on "Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered".

Consensus on the Need for a Hierarchical List of Patient-reported Pain Outcomes for Metaanalyses of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: An OMERACT Objective

Consensus on the need for a hierarchical list of patient-reported pain outcomes for meta-analyses of knee osteoarthritis trials

Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain

Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain

Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda

Current challenges in clinimetrics

Definition of clinical differences

Dialogue on Developing Consensus on Measurement and Presentation of Patient-important Outcomes, Using Pain Outcomes as an Exemplar, in Systematic Reviews: A Preconference Meeting at OMERACT 12.

Effectiveness of exercise therapy: a best-evidence summary of systematic reviews

Erratum to: Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain

Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments

Everyday Barriers in Communicative Participation According to People With Communication Problems

How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline

Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT)

Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change

Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Yearly Imaging Surveillance in Patients Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Predicting sequelae and death after bacterial meningitis in childhood: A systematic review of prognostic studies ⬇️

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

Reproducibility and validity of the DynaPort KneeTest

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph ⬇️

Substitution of Usual Perioperative Care by eHealth to Enhance Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing General Surgical or Gynecological Procedures: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Systematic Review of Childhood Sedentary Behavior Questionnaires: What do We Know and What is Next?

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument

The Value of Item Banks, CAT, and PROMIS for Dermatology

Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values.

Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for Automatic Assessment of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function Based on Area Strain ⬇️

Validation of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks in Dutch adolescents.

Validation of two PROMIS item banks for measuring social participation in the Dutch general population

When to use agreement versus reliability measures.