Lista de obras - Sara Schroter - Dominio Público Uruguay

Abstracts from the NIHR INVOLVE Conference 2017: London, UK. 28 November 2017.

artículo científico publicado en 2017

Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing: two cross sectional surveys

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors

scientific article published on 21 September 2020

BMJ pico for original research in the print BMJ

artículo científico publicado en 2009

BMJ training for peer reviewers: We are offering free courses in London and a training pack on.

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Better together: patient partnership in medical journals

artículo científico publicado en 2018

Biomedical authors' awareness of publication ethics: an international survey

scholarly article by Sara Schroter et al published 25 November 2018 in BMJ Open

Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Co-creating health: more than a dream.

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Conflicts of Interest in Dermatology

Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial

artículo científico publicado en 2002

Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Early Experiences With Journal Data Sharing Policies: A Survey of Published Clinical Trial Investigators

Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial

scientific article published on 18 May 2020

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Effects of Differences Between Peer Reviewers Suggested by Authors and by Editors—Reply

scientific article published in The Journal of the American Medical Association

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Eliciting and using expert opinions about dropout bias in randomized controlled trials

artículo científico publicado en 2007

Evaluation of an online Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) for health professionals: a randomised controlled trial

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Evaluation of an online interactive Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) versus online self-directed learning: a randomised controlled trial

artículo científico publicado en 2011

Evaluation of outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: development of a scientifically rigorous, patient-reported measure of symptoms and quality of life

artículo científico publicado en 2003

Evidence based publishing

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ.

artículo científico publicado en 2016

Financial support at the time of paper acceptance: a survey of three medical journals

article

Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed

scientific article published on 21 October 2019

Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study.

artículo científico publicado en 2018

From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses

artículo científico publicado en 2017

How should abridged scientific articles be presented in journals? A survey of readers and authors

artículo científico publicado en 2005

How statistical expertise is used in medical research

artículo científico publicado en 2002

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

artículo científico publicado en 2020

Importance of free access to research articles on decision to submit to the BMJ: survey of authors

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Improving the transparency of prognosis research: the role of reporting, data sharing, registration, and protocols

artículo científico publicado en 2014

International challenges without borders: a descriptive study of family physicians' educational needs in the field of diabetes

artículo científico publicado en 2011

LoggingThe BMJ’s “patient journey”

scientific article published in the British Medical Journal

Open Access Publishing and Author-Pays Business Models: A Survey of Authors’ Knowledge and Perceptions

scholarly article by Sara Schroter & Leanne Tite published March 2006 in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions

article

Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

artículo científico publicado en 2019

Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors

artículo científico publicado en 2005

Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals

article

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 5 de febrero de 2013

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 5 de febrero de 2013

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 5 de febrero de 2013

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: Stratified medicine research ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 5 de febrero de 2013

Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot

artículo científico publicado en 2017

Qualitative research andThe BMJ

scientific article published in the British Medical Journal

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials

artículo científico publicado en 2012

Recruitment of doctors to non-standard grades in the NHS: analysis of job advertisements and survey of advertisers.

artículo científico publicado en 2003

Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Response to Scientific journals are 'faith based': is there a science behind peer review?

article

Responsiveness of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire compared with the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers

artículo científico publicado en 2018

Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ.

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

artículo científico publicado en 2010

The BMJeditors respond

artículo científico publicado en 2016

The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.

artículo científico publicado en 2000

The community-acquired pneumonia symptom questionnaire: a new, patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

artículo científico publicado en 2002

Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire

artículo científico publicado en 2017

Two Postal Surveys of Different Methods of Communicating Rejection to Authors Submitting to a General Medical Journal

Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey

artículo científico publicado en 2007

What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

artículo científico publicado en 2008

What happens to papers rejected by the BMJ on ethical grounds

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

artículo científico publicado en 2007

Lista de obras de Sara Schroter

Abstracts from the NIHR INVOLVE Conference 2017: London, UK. 28 November 2017.

Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing: two cross sectional surveys

Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors

BMJ pico for original research in the print BMJ

BMJ training for peer reviewers: We are offering free courses in London and a training pack on.

Better together: patient partnership in medical journals

Biomedical authors' awareness of publication ethics: an international survey

Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project

Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: a descriptive study

Co-creating health: more than a dream.

Conflicts of Interest in Dermatology

Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty

Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors

Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial

Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial

Early Experiences With Journal Data Sharing Policies: A Survey of Published Clinical Trial Investigators

Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest

Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Effects of Differences Between Peer Reviewers Suggested by Authors and by Editors—Reply

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

Eliciting and using expert opinions about dropout bias in randomized controlled trials

Evaluation of an online Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) for health professionals: a randomised controlled trial

Evaluation of an online interactive Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) versus online self-directed learning: a randomised controlled trial

Evaluation of outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: development of a scientifically rigorous, patient-reported measure of symptoms and quality of life

Evidence based publishing

Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ.

Financial support at the time of paper acceptance: a survey of three medical journals

Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed

Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study.

From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal

Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses

How should abridged scientific articles be presented in journals? A survey of readers and authors

How statistical expertise is used in medical research

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Importance of free access to research articles on decision to submit to the BMJ: survey of authors

Improving the transparency of prognosis research: the role of reporting, data sharing, registration, and protocols

International challenges without borders: a descriptive study of family physicians' educational needs in the field of diabetes

LoggingThe BMJ’s “patient journey”

Open Access Publishing and Author-Pays Business Models: A Survey of Authors’ Knowledge and Perceptions

Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions

Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors

Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research ⬇️

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research ⬇️

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes ⬇️

Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: Stratified medicine research ⬇️

Psychometric validation of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQv2) in the context of the NHS Coronary Revascularisation PROMs Pilot

Qualitative research andThe BMJ

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials

Recruitment of doctors to non-standard grades in the NHS: analysis of job advertisements and survey of advertisers.

Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals

Response to Scientific journals are 'faith based': is there a science behind peer review?

Responsiveness of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire compared with the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers

Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ.

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

The BMJeditors respond

The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.

The community-acquired pneumonia symptom questionnaire: a new, patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire

Two Postal Surveys of Different Methods of Communicating Rejection to Authors Submitting to a General Medical Journal

Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey

What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

What happens to papers rejected by the BMJ on ethical grounds

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey