Lista de obras - Alessandro Liberati - Dominio Público Uruguay

A field guide to experts

artículo científico publicado en 2004

A meta-analysis of trials on aldose reductase inhibitors in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The Italian Study Group. The St. Vincent Declaration

artículo científico publicado en 1996

A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers

artículo científico publicado en 2010

Antibiotic prophylaxis in intensive care units: meta-analyses versus clinical practice

artículo científico publicado en 2000

Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent nosocomial infections in patients in intensive care units: evidence that struggle to convince practising clinicians

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Antibiotics for preventing respiratory tract infections in adults receiving intensive care

artículo científico publicado en 2000

Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: from evidence to application: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study

artículo científico publicado en 2005

Beware of surrogate outcome measures

artículo científico publicado en 1996

Clinical Evidence: a useful tool for promoting evidence-based practice?

artículo científico publicado en 2003

Clinical evidence continuous medical education: a randomised educational trial of an open access e-learning program for transferring evidence-based information - ICEKUBE (Italian Clinical Evidence Knowledge Utilization Behaviour Evaluation) - study p

article

Comment to “Why are Cochrane hepato-biliary reviews undervalued by physicians as an aid for clinical decision making?”

Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews

artículo científico publicado en 1996

Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Conceptual frameworks and empirical approaches used to assess the impact of health research: an overview of reviews ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 24 de junio de 2011

Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results

artículo científico publicado en 2013

Developing clinical recommendations for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer adjuvant treatments using the GRADE system: a study from the Programma Ricerca e Innovazione Emilia Romagna Oncology Research Group

Do specialists do it better? The impact of specialization on the processes and outcomes of care for cancer patients

artículo científico publicado en 1998

Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 25 de abril de 1998

Efficacy and safety of venous angioplasty of the extracranial veins for multiple sclerosis. Brave dreams study (brain venous drainage exploited against multiple sclerosis): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

artículo científico publicado en 2012

Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer

article by M P Rojas et al published 25 January 2005 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence

artículo científico publicado en 2012

Going from evidence to recommendations

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Health policies on drug dependence must be based on scientific evidence

artículo científico publicado en 2002

Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Information from drug companies and opinion leaders

artículo científico publicado en 2003

Informing women about hormone replacement therapy: the consensus conference statement

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Is the published literature a reliable guide for deciding between alternative treatments for patients with early cervical cancer?

artículo científico publicado en 1989

Measuring the impact of evidence: the Cochrane systematic review of organised stroke care

scientific article published on December 2009

Multiple systematic reviews: methods for assessing discordances of results

artículo científico publicado en 2012

PartecipaSalute, an Italian project to involve lay people, patients' associations and scientific-medical representatives in the health debate

scientific article published on June 2007

Patient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interests

artículo científico

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

artículo científico publicado en 2015

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 21 de julio de 2009

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

artículo científico publicado en 2010

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

artículo científico publicado en 2009

Promoting Consumers' Demand for Evidence-Based Medicine ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 1 de enero de 1998

Psychological outcomes in women with early breast cancer

artículo científico publicado en 1990

Quality of life in women with recurrent breast cancer

artículo científico publicado en 1999

Renaissance of a res publica clinical research: global access to trial registers

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

scientific article published on September 2009

Review of Online Evidence-based Practice Point-of-Care Information Summary Providers: Authors’ Reply to the Response by the Publisher of DynaMed.

artículo científico publicado en 2010

Rimonabant for overweight and "metabolic syndrome": the attempt to supersize disease and risk by pharmaceutical marketing

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results

artículo científico publicado en 2003

Scales to climb borderline personalities: when science goes nowhere

Speed of updating online evidence based point of care summaries: prospective cohort analysis

artículo científico publicado en 2011

Systematic reviews highlight the complex balance between good and harm from screening studies

artículo científico publicado en 2007

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group

artículo científico publicado en 2004

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system

artículo científico publicado en 2005

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

artículo científico publicado en 2009

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

artículo científico publicado en 2009

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

artículo científico publicado en 2009

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

artículo científico publicado en 2009

The drama of cancer pain: when the research abandons patients and reason

The future of clinical research: why do we need an ecological approach?

artículo científico publicado en 2006

The impact of patient management guidelines on the care of breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer patients in Italy

artículo científico publicado en 1991

The influence of patient characteristics on the appropriateness of surgical treatment for breast cancer patients. Progetto Oncologia Femminile

artículo científico publicado en 1993

The multi-centre assessment of quality of life: the Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation (GIVIO) experience in Italy ⬇️

artículo científico publicado el 15 de abril de 1998

The role of attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics of Italian physicians in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer

article

The systematic review of organised stroke care: a model for an unbiased assessment of trials on the effects of service organisation

artículo científico publicado en 2006

Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hours have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients

artículo científico publicado en 2012

Understanding systematic reviews: the meta-analysis graph (also called ‘forest plot’)

scholarly article by L. Moja et al published June 2007 in Internal and emergency medicine

Updating clinical recommendations for breast, colorectal and lung cancer treatments: an opportunity to improve methodology and clinical relevance

Using Clinical Evidence in a national continuing medical education program in Italy

artículo científico publicado en 2007

What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?

artículo científico publicado en 2000

When drug companies select what they want to publish patients are denied relevant therapeutic information

artículo científico publicado en 2008

Lista de obras de Alessandro Liberati

A field guide to experts

A meta-analysis of trials on aldose reductase inhibitors in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The Italian Study Group. The St. Vincent Declaration

A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers

Antibiotic prophylaxis in intensive care units: meta-analyses versus clinical practice

Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent nosocomial infections in patients in intensive care units: evidence that struggle to convince practising clinicians

Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care

Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care

Antibiotics for preventing respiratory tract infections in adults receiving intensive care

Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: from evidence to application: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study

Beware of surrogate outcome measures

Clinical Evidence: a useful tool for promoting evidence-based practice?

Clinical evidence continuous medical education: a randomised educational trial of an open access e-learning program for transferring evidence-based information - ICEKUBE (Italian Clinical Evidence Knowledge Utilization Behaviour Evaluation) - study p

Comment to “Why are Cochrane hepato-biliary reviews undervalued by physicians as an aid for clinical decision making?”

Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews

Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey

Conceptual frameworks and empirical approaches used to assess the impact of health research: an overview of reviews ⬇️

Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results

Developing clinical recommendations for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer adjuvant treatments using the GRADE system: a study from the Programma Ricerca e Innovazione Emilia Romagna Oncology Research Group

Do specialists do it better? The impact of specialization on the processes and outcomes of care for cancer patients

Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials ⬇️

Efficacy and safety of venous angioplasty of the extracranial veins for multiple sclerosis. Brave dreams study (brain venous drainage exploited against multiple sclerosis): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer

GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence

Going from evidence to recommendations

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Health policies on drug dependence must be based on scientific evidence

Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

Information from drug companies and opinion leaders

Informing women about hormone replacement therapy: the consensus conference statement

Is the published literature a reliable guide for deciding between alternative treatments for patients with early cervical cancer?

Measuring the impact of evidence: the Cochrane systematic review of organised stroke care

Multiple systematic reviews: methods for assessing discordances of results

PartecipaSalute, an Italian project to involve lay people, patients' associations and scientific-medical representatives in the health debate

Patient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interests

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement ⬇️

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Promoting Consumers' Demand for Evidence-Based Medicine ⬇️

Psychological outcomes in women with early breast cancer

Quality of life in women with recurrent breast cancer

Renaissance of a res publica clinical research: global access to trial registers

Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Review of Online Evidence-based Practice Point-of-Care Information Summary Providers: Authors’ Reply to the Response by the Publisher of DynaMed.

Rimonabant for overweight and "metabolic syndrome": the attempt to supersize disease and risk by pharmaceutical marketing

Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results

Scales to climb borderline personalities: when science goes nowhere

Speed of updating online evidence based point of care summaries: prospective cohort analysis

Systematic reviews highlight the complex balance between good and harm from screening studies

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

The drama of cancer pain: when the research abandons patients and reason

The future of clinical research: why do we need an ecological approach?

The impact of patient management guidelines on the care of breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer patients in Italy

The influence of patient characteristics on the appropriateness of surgical treatment for breast cancer patients. Progetto Oncologia Femminile

The multi-centre assessment of quality of life: the Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation (GIVIO) experience in Italy ⬇️

The role of attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics of Italian physicians in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer

The systematic review of organised stroke care: a model for an unbiased assessment of trials on the effects of service organisation

Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hours have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients

Understanding systematic reviews: the meta-analysis graph (also called ‘forest plot’)

Updating clinical recommendations for breast, colorectal and lung cancer treatments: an opportunity to improve methodology and clinical relevance

Using Clinical Evidence in a national continuing medical education program in Italy

What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?

When drug companies select what they want to publish patients are denied relevant therapeutic information